Log in

No account? Create an account
Hat Tip to randomcub for this gem 
12th-Jan-2007 11:36 am
Imagine No Religion
Thank You, Jimmy Carter
Rabbi Michael Lerner
Michael Lerner is editor of Tikkun magazine, rabbi of Beyt Tikkun synagogue, which meets in San Francisco and Berkeley, and national chair of the Network of Spiritual Progressives. He is the author of Healing Israel/Palestine (North Atlantic Books, 2003) and of the national best-seller The Left Hand of God: Taking Back our Country from the Religious Right (Harper San Francisco, 2006).
Jimmy Carter was the best friend the Jews ever had as president of the United States.

He is the only president to have actually delivered for the Jewish people an agreement (the peace treaty between Israel and Egypt) that has stood the test of time. Since the treaty, there have been bad vibes between Israel and Egypt, but never a return to war, once Israel fully withdrew from the territories it conquered in Egypt during the 1967 war.

To get that agreement, Carter had to twist the arms of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat. Sometimes that is what real friends do—they push you into a path that is really in your best interest at times when there is an emergency and you are acting self-destructively.

When the U.S. government is following a self-destructive policy, even a policy backed by people in both major political parties, its best friends are those who try to change its direction and are not afraid to offer intense critique. That’s why a majority of Americans, and 86 percent of American Jews, voted in the 2006 midterm elections to reject Bush’s war in Iraq and his policies suspending habeas corpus and legitimating wire-tapping and torture. Not because we were disloyal, but precisely because we love America enough to challenge its policies even when Vice President Cheney questions our loyalty. We know that critique is often an essential part of love and caring.

That is precisely what Jimmy Carter is trying to do for Israel and the Jewish people in his new book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.

12th-Jan-2007 05:21 pm (UTC)
Carter's mistake was using the politically loaded buzzword "apartheid" outside of its original context as an intellectually cheap shortcut for his well reasoned position. You only muddy waters that way, and you set off debate over terminology as opposed to your arguments.

Of course, since American political discourse has largely degenerated to "buzzword bingo," I guess it would be hard for him to avoid it as well.
12th-Jan-2007 07:04 pm (UTC)
"buzzword bingo" - I'm going to remember that next time I take a journalism lecture..
12th-Jan-2007 07:08 pm (UTC)

Beware the dogmatists in the room with you then. There are those who LOVE their buzzwords, and seek to control and strangle all debate by their strategic and "unquestionable" usage of them :)
12th-Jan-2007 06:43 pm (UTC)
Dig the new layout!

For some reason this reminded me a little of olof Palme. Of course, he was in power as prime minister when he was criticized for his thoughts and actions, and he didn't just write a book. But what I am thinking is that in hindsight, a majority will look back at what Carter has said and tend to agree..
12th-Jan-2007 07:03 pm (UTC)
(oh yeah, besides the fact that he used the word apartheid and Palme was involved in the struggle against apartheid)
13th-Jan-2007 02:44 am (UTC)
Michael Lerner has at times really annoyed me, but he nailed this one, & I'm really glad to see a major Jewish figure stand up for Carter on this matter (I'd qualify as a minor Jewish figure). Israel *is* creating an apartheidesque situation in the West Bank, and Lerner is dead on in describing each side's inability to hear the other or see beyond its own sense of victimization.

Off-topic: the Bucks are coming to Columbus on 1/27.
This page was loaded Feb 20th 2018, 8:00 am GMT.