Log in

No account? Create an account
Here we go again, giant leaps of regressive politicking in Georgia! 
28th-Feb-2006 10:31 pm
Attention Georgians: Oppose HR 1345 – The “Faith-based” Amendment
The Georgia House of Representatives will consider House Resolution 1345 – the “Faith-based Initiative” which amends the Georgia Constitution to end the separation between church and state thereby allowing taxpayer funds to be given to churches and other faith groups to provide many of the services currently provided by the state. These “Faith-based” organizations would be allowed to discriminate based on sexual orientation, gender identity or questioning. This issue is being pushed by Governor Sonny Perdue since it would be on the 2006 ballot at the same time he is up for re-election and is strongly supported by the radical right. The change would also allow for school vouchers.


What's At Stake:
The Coalition to Protect Georgia s Bill of Rights consists of 28 religious, education, civil rights, and social service groups who have joined together in opposition to amending the Georgia constitutional provision governing religious freedom. Georgia has had a state provision governing church and state since 1777, when it was written and promoted by a Baptist minister named Silas Mercer. It has served us well for 228 years. We should not abandon the protections that have helped religion flourish in Georgia for all of these years.

The Coalition opposes the amendment for the following reasons:

The amendment actually REPEALS our current constitutional provision. It abdicates all of the State’s power to define religious liberty to the federal courts.

The amendment would open the door to SCHOOL VOUCHERS because it would allow state money to go to religious schools.

Religious houses of worship that would provide these taxpayer-funded services must be accountable to the public.

The amendment is unnecessary. The Georgia Supreme Court said in its January 17, 2006, decision in Taetle vs. Atlanta Independent School System that the state may not fund religious activities, but ”?that is not to say that a political subdivision of the state cannot enter into an arms-length, commercial agreement with a sectarian institution to accomplish a non-sectarian purpose.”

Religious organizations are exempt in their private hiring from portions of the civil rights act and thus can hire and fire based upon a person's religious beliefs. Disturbingly, there are many, including the Bush Administration, who advocate that religious organizations can engage in discrimination while using taxpayer dollars. Georgia's current constitution protects against this.

The money threatens the voluntariness of religious activities and the autonomy of houses of worship.

Our provision has no connection to anti-Catholic animus. Our amendment first appeared in 1777, one hundred-plus years before the so-called Blaine amendments were passed. Furthermore, the current language of our provision differs from the language of the Blaine amendments.

Funding of pervasively sectarian programs is unworkable. Who will decide which religion is better than the others? How will Georgia afford to provide the constitutionally required secular alternative services to each religious service? Will the state discriminate against or fund minority religions such as Scientology, Islam, and Wicca?

[DIY News post format]
28th-Feb-2006 03:57 am (UTC)
Sick, just plain sick
28th-Feb-2006 11:26 am (UTC)
I concur.
28th-Feb-2006 04:01 am (UTC)
I blame a LOT of this on schools not teaching that one of the big lead-ups to every empire's downfall is forced regulation of thoughts and morals to such an extent as religion is invoked to do so.

Bye bye America. You lasted longer than any other democracy!
28th-Feb-2006 11:27 am (UTC)
Well put!
28th-Feb-2006 06:57 am (UTC)
well... believe it or not, churches DO help out many communities. Homless are sheltered, battered women are given refuge, and the poor are given medical aid when the government fails to supprot them as they should.

I don't see how a US government CAN refuse aid to other religons if they have simular programs... and actually having this bill might help them achieve that as well.
28th-Feb-2006 11:52 am (UTC)
No argument from me that some do, but my experience is that the majority don't work for others in the community - only for themselves - and I peak frommy experience and my observations. The fact remains that this is unconstitutional right out of the gate and will only further divide this state, let alone that it will create millions more dollars in litigation that if anything should be going back into our pathetic school system.

GA Governor Sonny Perdue is a Republican, and this is an election year. Need I say more? Consider the innate hypocrisy and backhanded policies instituted by this administration and similar ones over the years and there should be no wonder on your (or anyone's) part, it should be clear. Conservatives use the easiest things available to spin the faithful into frenzy and it usually amounts to regression and divisiveness. That's primarily because without the blind followers who vote based on fear created from hysteria, people have to actually think in logistics and distill off the things that don't apply to them and don't matter. That's never been the case with the moral majority in this or any other federation.

1st-Mar-2006 04:28 am (UTC) - Well now... isn't this a nice little peice of trash...
I've always thought that this country needed to be tested for it's greater survival. This is just one of those things. To see if the separation of religion and state can be maintained.
All it takes is one state to push it forward and then the rest will follow if the Supreme Court passes it.
Oh yea, this is gonna be fun.
Phase Two: Push the Supreme Court with every agenda they have from abortion to religious domination.
Hope you manage to stop it before it goes that far.
Good luck.
This page was loaded Feb 18th 2018, 7:00 am GMT.