?

Log in

BACK DOOR BOY IN A FRONT DOOR WORLD
OUTSIDE OF SOCIETY - THAT'S WHERE I WANT TO BE
Um, Durr? 
31st-Mar-2008 10:35 am
Gloryhole
Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal?
Adams HE, Wright LW Jr, Lohr BA.

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30602-3013, USA.

The authors investigated the role of homosexual arousal in exclusively heterosexual men who admitted negative affect toward homosexual individuals. Participants consisted of a group of homophobic men (n = 35) and a group of nonhomophobic men (n = 29); they were assigned to groups on the basis of their scores on the Index of Homophobia (W. W. Hudson & W. A. Ricketts, 1980). The men were exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference were monitored. They also completed an Aggression Questionnaire (A. H. Buss & M. Perry, 1992). Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.
Hands up - who's surprised? Every time I see some asshole spewing anti-gay bullshit, I always think "Get over yourself - you know you want the noodle..." - and now I have the data to back it up.
Comments 
31st-Mar-2008 02:36 pm (UTC)
"Get over yourself - you know you want the noodle..."

this is why i heart you.
31st-Mar-2008 02:37 pm (UTC)
woahhhhhh

interesting
31st-Mar-2008 02:42 pm (UTC)
I know - pretty cool, huh?

Do me a favor when you get a minute and explain this to me in lay terms, please. I'm sure that for certain academics it's perfectly understandable, but I'm neither caffeinated sufficiently or properly versed in this terminology enough for it to make clear sense to me.
31st-Mar-2008 02:44 pm (UTC)
Color me distinctly unsurprised.
31st-Mar-2008 02:46 pm (UTC)
Er, I meant that for the main post.

There is no reason for people to write the way they did in that link. Sweet Jebus. I doubt even the author could understand things written like that.
31st-Mar-2008 02:50 pm (UTC)
Well, it's a matter of academic record and the findings of these studies have to be worded as such.

*picks teeth with straw, kicks dirt*
31st-Mar-2008 03:13 pm (UTC)
I know, I know, but it doesn't have to be completely incomprehensible!
31st-Mar-2008 03:01 pm (UTC)
Based on this where it says "It is an electrical event indicative of a state of readiness or expectancy" I'd say that it's way of putting electrodes on the brain to measure when when you're horned - in this case if a picture of naked female, male, or underage booty makes you horned.
31st-Mar-2008 02:47 pm (UTC)
Well, who knew? He who screams "faggot" the loudest... is!
31st-Mar-2008 02:51 pm (UTC)
MMMM... ROUGH TRADE...
31st-Mar-2008 02:54 pm (UTC)
Now, that said, I really don't like the idea of Fred Phelps being one of us. It's like accepting Rosie O'Donnell as a liberal standard-bearer. DO NOT WANT!
31st-Mar-2008 02:50 pm (UTC)
sadly coming on to the homophobic isn't very effective
31st-Mar-2008 02:51 pm (UTC)
If you're into really rough trade it is!
31st-Mar-2008 03:01 pm (UTC)
Somehow, I have never managed to fetishize getting beat up by the angry and sexually unfulfilled.

31st-Mar-2008 02:55 pm (UTC)
Oh, I dunno. If you can lure one to a private place with promises of beer and NASCAR videos... :-)
31st-Mar-2008 03:00 pm (UTC)
was that you I replied to on Craigslist? ;)
31st-Mar-2008 03:02 pm (UTC)
DALE AIN'T DEAD, HE JUST WENT HOME TO BABY JESUS, NOW SUCK MY COCK, FAGGOT.
31st-Mar-2008 09:14 pm (UTC)
holy shit LOL!!!!!!!!
31st-Mar-2008 03:19 pm (UTC)
It reminds me of the little girl who punches the little boy in the arm all the time on the playground. She's interested but wont' say so. Very curious...
31st-Mar-2008 04:34 pm (UTC)
Whats nice about this is I think the LW Wright listed as one of the co authors is in fact Les Wright who authored the book
" The Bear Book - Readings in the History and Evolution of a Gay Male Subculture". He's one of us.

And - who says the article is hard to understand? Honestly - the abstract will tell you everything you need to know - the actual paper will go into greater depth - talking about how they picked their sample population, what kind of instruments (surveys perhaps) they used and how they analyzed their data. The article will go into detail step by step how they conducted their research and why you should consider their findings valid.
31st-Mar-2008 05:17 pm (UTC)
Now I'll be really impressed with the studying how the University of Georgia causes homophobia ;)
31st-Mar-2008 05:19 pm (UTC)
Anonymous
I'm kind of skeptical of this.
31st-Mar-2008 05:20 pm (UTC)
T'was me. Livejournal won't keep me logged in today for some reason.
31st-Mar-2008 06:49 pm (UTC)
I LOVED introducing this study to my class when I taught Stereotyping and Prejudice. It has its weaknessness, like any social scientific study (or any study for that matter), but for being done such a relatively long time ago, there's not a lot of current research using similar methodologies. I wonder why that is. My guess would be many IRBs (Institutional Review Boards) deem messing with guys junk ethically questionable. Of course, many of the devices are self-applicable. Either way, it's HOT. Penises rock <3
31st-Mar-2008 09:11 pm (UTC)
First off - LOVE LOVE LOVE the saucy photo of you!

Hands DOWN! I am not shocked by this news in the least. I had my own theories about this.
31st-Mar-2008 11:38 pm (UTC)
Devil's Advocate:

What if stimuli is just stimuli. Sure, its erotic, but it doesn't neccesarily mean that you're ALWAYS down with it? I mean, of course there are straight guys, and for whatever reasons, do not EVER want to participate in homosexual acts. But studies like this almost make it easy for us to tease and taunt them into giving in?

I say lets just live and let live.
1st-Apr-2008 01:07 am (UTC)
But why would only those having strong negative attitudes towards homosexuality have the increased display? This isn't just a correlation. This study demonstrates that compared to heterosexual males who do not harbor negative attitudes about homosexuality, those that do harbor negative attitudes get bigger boners.

If it were just stimuli then there should be no difference.
1st-Apr-2008 12:10 am (UTC)
Is this something new? I remember hearing about this (or something virtually identical) around 5 years ago or so.
1st-Apr-2008 01:12 am (UTC)
For people who want to read the full article, here you go.

Adams, H.E., Wright, L.W., and Lohr, B.A. (1996). Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal? Journal of Abormnal Psychology, 105, 440-445.
1st-Apr-2008 01:14 am (UTC)
This is my shocked face. No really.
1st-Apr-2008 03:50 am (UTC)
Studies have proven this in the past, too, but naturally homophobes just pretend it is some sort of evil persecution from the "gay activists" to condemn them and destroy their religious liberty.
1st-Apr-2008 06:13 am (UTC)
Awesome! Thanks for posting this. I can't wait to add it to my ammo.

;oD
This page was loaded Jul 27th 2017, 4:55 am GMT.